![]() Right now, millions and hundreds of millions of people will probably see this film,” he said. “Other perspectives can be brought to film, but the funding is so uneven. But he emphasized that “it’s not a level playing field” and reach continues to be an issue. “That lack of more of a global perspective allows atrocities to continue to happen because we still dehumanize other people that we don’t know.”įilms about other perspectives, Shikuma said, often fall on the independent filmmaking community. initiatives or perspectives,” said Stan Shikuma, co-president of the Seattle Chapter of the Japanese American Citizens League. … But I think it also points societally to the lack of nonwhite, non-U.S. “I understand how showrooms and Hollywood cannot be all-encompassing. Moreover, public education doesn’t help, providing little information or awareness around the continued health issues that victims face, she said. But with a range of movies that focus on the American perspective, like 2001’s “Pearl Harbor,” there remains a further shifting of the victims’ experiences. With its large-scale marketing and investment, the movie, which raked in $82.5 million domestically and $98 million internationally in its opening weekend, holds weight due to its massive audience, as well, Wallace said. “What we’re meant to see when we look into the skeletal face of Oppenheimer is the distance between Oppenheimer and actual human beings.” “ are the specter on the far side of the horizon, and therefore not entirely knowable,” Shimoda said. ![]() And the movie has largely been billed as a contemplation over the moral dilemmas facing the scientists. Oppenheimer’s work led to the deaths of more than 200,000 people by some estimates, as well as a generation of “hibakusha,” or survivors of the blast - many of whom continue to contend with the impacts of the bomb to this day. Robert Oppenheimer,” the film was released Friday and follows the physicist’s ascent into his role as the director of the clandestine weapons lab in Los Alamos, New Mexico, as part of the Manhattan Project, the top-secret U.S. “But it is true that these institutions that are in positions of power, positions of influence, put more value on stories of men like Oppenheimer, like Truman, than it does on the Asian and indigenous communities that suffered because of decisions that those men made.”īased on the 2005 biography “American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. “I don’t think we should depend on Hollywood to tell our stories with the nuance and the depth and the care that they really deserve,” Nina Wallace, media and outreach manager at Densho, a nonprofit group dedicated to preserving the stories of those of Japanese descent. They emphasized that while no one film has the responsibility to illustrate Japanese victims’ perspective, “Oppenheimer” does little to challenge the long history of glorifying the work of white men, and risks perpetuating the persistent, often reductive, portrayals of Japanese victims in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Experts say that the issue of representation is more nuanced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |